• Which you said changed 130 years ago

    The definition of Division changed more than 130 years ago. a+b/c+d originally meant (a+b)/(c+d), but that limited you to one division per expression, so they changed the definition to be a+b/c+d=a+(b/c)+d, which brought it into line with all the other operators - the underlying Maths never changed, just the way we write expressions did

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ohhh, so there is a difference between what’s in math(s) books and the underlying laws of reality. When it lets you scold people.

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Probably the part where you said how we write expressions is different from the underlying maths.

          Because words mean things.

          • 💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Probably the part where you said how we write expressions is different from the underlying maths

            Yep, the underlying Maths is the same everywhere, because the rules are universal, but different countries have different notations, it’s still the same Maths

            Because words mean things

            And you seem to be having trouble understanding the difference between “notation” and “rules”

            • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              My guy, you’re all over this thread hassling people as if there’s only one valid notation. I warned folks about your cocksure confusion of notation and rules two weeks ago, and your oblivious ass did exactly that in response to my warning.

              You’re so confused about notation versus rules that you think RPN must have parentheses, somewhere, somehow, because they’re in the One True Notation.

              I don’t think you understand being wrong, as a concept. Your brain slides right off it and circles back to a sequence of words that lets you be smug.

              • only one valid notation

                Only one valid set of rules you mean. Notation varies by country

                I warned folks about your cocksure confusion of notation and rules

                says person who is confused about the difference between notation and rules 😂

                You’re so confused about notation versus rules

                Nope! That’s you

                RPN must have parentheses, somewhere, somehow, because they’re in the One True

                Rules There you go confusing notation with rules again

                I don’t think you understand being wrong, as a concept

                says person who refuses to look in Maths textbooks 😂

                Your brain slides right off it and circles back to a sequence of words that lets you be smug

                And here you are writing a bunch of words and no Maths textbooks 😂