LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agoI dunnolockpiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square763fedilinkarrow-up1809arrow-down179
arrow-up1730arrow-down1imageI dunnolockpiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square763fedilink
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·5 days ago a*b and ab are both the product of a and b, Nope. Only ab is the product of a and b. axb is Multiplication of 2 terms As explained by the textbook you chose If you had read more than 2 sentences of it, you would discover that you cannot use axb to show the product, only ab 🙄 a*b2 is ab2 No it isn’t 😂 1/axb²=b²/a. 1/ab²=1/ab². Welcome to why we teach students about Terms 🙄 No textbook you’re grasping for contains your made-up exception Law is the word you’re looking for, and I posted dozens of them here in this post which you keep ignoring Mr. Ostrich They all show what I’m rubbing your nose in. You’re just full of shit. Nope, they all show you are full of shit Mr. Ostrich. See previous link
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days ago says person who can’t back up anything they say about Terms with textbook references “a X b is written ab and means a times b.” Rub rub rub.
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·5 days ago“a X b is written ab and means a times b.” Rub rub rub.
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·5 days ago “a X b is written ab and means a times b.” Notice that it doesn’t say equals, speaking of Illiterate fraud, as per your other comment 🙄
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-25 days agoThey’re more than equal - ab means a*b. It’s an identity, which you’d understand, if you weren’t lying about being a teacher.
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·5 days ago They’re more than equal They’re not equal at all 🙄 If a=2, b=3… 1/ab=1/(2x3)=1/6 1/axb=1/2x3=3/2=1.5 It’s an identity, which you’d understand Nope! axb==ab is an identity, which is NOT how it’s written, “illiterate fraud” as per your other comment if you weren’t lying about being a teacher says person who is lying about what the textbook says 🙄
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·5 days agoConvention saying 1/a(b+c)2 is 1/(a(b+c)2) instead of (1/a)(b+c)2 doesn’t change how only (b+c) is squared.
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·5 days ago Convention saying 1/a(b+c)2 is 1/(a(b+c)2) There’s no such convention, given it would violate The Distributive Law 🙄
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·5 days agoYou can’t keep your own horseshit straight.
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·5 days ago You can’t keep your own horseshit straight No idea what you’re talking about, again, I’ve been saying the same thing the whole time
Nope. Only ab is the product of a and b. axb is Multiplication of 2 terms
If you had read more than 2 sentences of it, you would discover that you cannot use axb to show the product, only ab 🙄
No it isn’t 😂 1/axb²=b²/a. 1/ab²=1/ab². Welcome to why we teach students about Terms 🙄
Law is the word you’re looking for, and I posted dozens of them here in this post which you keep ignoring Mr. Ostrich
Nope, they all show you are full of shit Mr. Ostrich. See previous link
“a X b is written ab and means a times b.”
Rub rub rub.
“a X b is written ab and means a times b.”
Rub rub rub.
Notice that it doesn’t say equals, speaking of Illiterate fraud, as per your other comment 🙄
They’re more than equal - ab means a*b. It’s an identity, which you’d understand, if you weren’t lying about being a teacher.
They’re not equal at all 🙄
If a=2, b=3…
1/ab=1/(2x3)=1/6
1/axb=1/2x3=3/2=1.5
Nope! axb==ab is an identity, which is NOT how it’s written, “illiterate fraud” as per your other comment
says person who is lying about what the textbook says 🙄
Convention saying 1/a(b+c)2 is 1/(a(b+c)2) instead of (1/a)(b+c)2 doesn’t change how only (b+c) is squared.
There’s no such convention, given it would violate The Distributive Law 🙄
You can’t keep your own horseshit straight.
No idea what you’re talking about, again, I’ve been saying the same thing the whole time