• imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Last time I have heard about a L4D co-creator making another co-op game, we got Back 4 Blood which I got beta for and which sucked some major ass and eventually died in less than 2 years after release. So, no. I am not hyped and nobody should until they actually show a good game. Glad my beta was free. Didn’t had to pay for this crap to figure out it is crap.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    You can’t be out of the game this long and think you’re going to make another left 4 dead. We saw that with back 4 blood and we will see it with this one.

    • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      As a hardcore fan of L4D, I just found it hilarious that I had to google for the name of their spiritual successor to L4D and that game before Back 4 Blood where you have 4 teammates hunt or be hunted by 1 big monster. Both are unmemorable abandonware games while L4D2 (also is kind of an abandonware) somehow is still played and is almost old enough to drink. Fucking timeless classic, I may say.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        I love l4d2 and when i saw b4b on sale for $5 I was so excited. Surely I can get $5 of value of out this game. Nope after playing the first level everything was off with the game and I refunded it.

        I instantly disliked the shooting and quickly grew to hate all the colourful effects they added. None of the effects fit the style of the game.

  • warmaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I hope it’s not another Sony attempt at a live service game.

    Edit: lol, wtf Sony?

    • caut_R@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      They‘ve been so successful with singleplayer stuff but would somehow rather burn billions failing live services than sticking with them. They could‘ve put that money into several offline experiences and made at least SOME money but yeah, rather lose MOUNTAINS of money, I guess.

  • nfreak@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It feels like so many devs and studios have been trying to bring back the magic of that era but L4D was such a product of the times. Hard to imagine any similar games in that vein succeeding today.

    • Agent Karyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I don’t know about that. If Valve made Left 4 Dead 3 with some minor iterative improvements (better graphics, same gameplay, maybe a new mode) and no trash monetisation (B2P like the first two games), I think it would be very successful.

  • slimerancher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Not a huge fan of multiplayer games, but can be fun with friends.

    As for people who don’t like live service games, Sony has mentioned multiple times that the budget for live service games is completely separate from single player games. The issue was that they previously put their good single player studios to making these games, as long as they get proper third party or specialised studios for these and leave their first party studios for first party, I am happy.