• ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 小时前

    The good: WB development studios have been limited to making games off of only WB properties for so long. Developers would come up with a pitch or a prototype, but it wasn’t allowed to be an original IP, which was bad for them and Warner Bros., since it made it harder to sell off the video game division by itself. Maybe this will give those devs more freedom.

    The bad: We’re rapidly approaching that Bojack Horseman joke where there are only four companies with extremely long hyphenated names, and Netflix doesn’t seem to know what they want to do in the video game space or how to do it. They have an incentive to lock games exclusively behind subscriptions, which is what everyone was afraid Game Pass would do but Nintendo and Netflix are doing this already right now.

    • big_slap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 小时前

      whoa, nintendo locking games behind a subscription?

      hype for the (possible) positives giving game devs more freedom though! maybe we can get a proper arkham 4

      • absentbird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 小时前

        I assume they’re referring to the NSO emulators, that thing where you need to pay monthly to access the retro games.