• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I found it’s useful for code where I know like 70% of what I’m doing. More than that and I can just do it myself. Less than that and I can’t trust and diagnose the output.

    I’d rather have old fashioned stack overflow and tutorials, honestly. It’s hard to actually learn when it just gives answers.

    • cheesybuddha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I use it for coding advice sometimes, as an amateur hobbyist it’s really useful to point me in the right direction when facing problems I’m unfamiliar with. I often end up reinventing the proverbial wheel, just worse, but LLMs can help point out standards and best practices that I, as an outsider to the industry, am unaware of.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You have to be careful at low skill/knowledge levels, because it’ll happily send you down a crazy path that looks legitimate.

        I asked it how to do something in oracle SQL, because I don’t know oracle specifically, and it gave me a terrible answer. I suspected it wasn’t right so I asked a coworker who’s an old hand at Oracle, and he was like “no that’s terrible. Here’s a much simpler way”

    • Dalraz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I find it’s good at writing boilerplate and scaffolding code, the stuff I really hate doing.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      github copilot is fantastic for exactly this reason… completes a few lines, auto corrects, automatic find and replace, automatically fills a 3 line function body that would otherwise be an extra dependency