I am genuinely trying to get better at art. I’m not there yet (likely never will be), the lying machine is still better than me.

The context:

This is my sketch.

And this is what the ai output.

I like to think I poured my heart and soul into it. I know there are people who will tell me that I’m terrible for using ai at all. I’m also sorry if this is the wrong community to ask this question (ask reddit would delete my post instantly if I tried to post there).

Again, is this slop? I am not an artist. I drive a forklift real good, that’s my skillset. So if I were to use the ai upscaled version for my book, well, I’m asking for opinions.

  • village604@adultswim.fan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    How is that functionally different from a human training on freely available Internet artwork and selling the stuff they created by using said training?

    They’re using other artists’ work without crediting them.

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      How is that functionally different from a human training …

      It’s that part, right there.

      You don’t see it because of the social nihilism you’ve been accumulating.

    • dil@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Idk man maybe try making something yourself and youll instsntly feel the difference

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have, and I personally don’t think AI training is functionally different from the publicly available copyrighted works I used for references to develop the necessary skills to create.

        AI is just able to do it much faster than me.