• yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Well, curiosity comes in different stripes. Investigating your environment is one thing. Asking second-order questions is another.

    “May I have food?” vs “Why am I here?” and “What is the nature of consciousness?”

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      “Why are we here?”

      “One of life’s great mysteries isn’t it? Why are we here? I mean, are we the product of some cosmic coincidence? Or is there really a God, watching everything? You know, with a plan for us and stuff? I don’t know man, but it keeps me up at night.”

      “What? I mean why are we here, in this box canyon in the middle of nowhere?”

      • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        if you wake up in a compound, catered to your every need by weird alien captors, “why am I here?” is a pretty obvious question.

          • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            To be fair, the information that aliens created us for some particular purpose is empirically fascinating, don’t get me wrong, but normatively insignificant.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      They already understand the second order questions though. Why would they ask the humans?

      They know what’s outside their enclosures, they know they’re there because the humans want them there, they know strange humans like to see and interact with them through the glass. They just don’t care, so long as they have their tribe around with things to do and they get tasty food

      Animals understand existence better than humans do. They understand life and death better than we to. Our higher intelligence makes second order questions complicated because we put ourselves through mental gymnastics

      We should be asking apes about the meaning of life, not the other way around

      • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Second-order questions aren’t just the prosaic things any intelligent creature would ask, such as “why am I here?” or “what do you want from me?”

        but also the more esoteric, “what sort of creature are you?” And “what sort of creature am I?”

        Animals (and, indeed, most humans) don’t ask (or don’t really understand) second-order questions very well because that requires abstraction, which is the sort of reasoning that takes enormous amounts of education and curiosity.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          but also the more esoteric, “what sort of creature are you?” And “what sort of creature am I?”

          I agree, but that is the kind of question they do think about. Koko was “a wonderful gorilla person” in her own words

          There’s a dog that uses one of those word button mats that thinks small dogs are cats, dogs are dogs, and that she’s a human (or that her owner is also a dog, she’s convinced she’s the same as her owner and always gets confused when it’s explained otherwise)

          They don’t ask, because they already know what they think. They aren’t confused about where they stand in the world, it’s learning human categorization that confuses them

          • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I don’t want to conflate the pragmatic use of tools or manipulation of the environment with questions about the meaning of life. Even most humans can’t do the latter. We have a lot of depressing research showing that most people can barely engage in abstract reasoning at all, let alone effectively.

            I think nearly every sentient creature can be depressed and understand how badly life is going. But that’s different.

            • theneverfox@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t think that’s different, I think that’s very related to the topic at hand

              And yeah, that’s all true. All living things can suffer, down to single cells

              The real question here is where is the line between us and other animals. And I think you’re almost there - you’re on the verge of recognizing there is none, or maybe of internalizing that realization

              Most animals don’t often think about the meaning of life, just like most humans. They don’t think to ask us either, because we’re honestly a pretty foolish species. We’re powerful and intelligent, but not wise

              An orca, elephant, or corvid is probably the wisest being on earth right now. Possibly even a whole forest

              • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Elephants are wise in that they’re concerned with (some of) the things that matter most — social bonds and creature comforts. But, as far as we know, they can’t scrutinize these concerns in abstraction, or reflect on the nature of wisdom or the metanormative conditions of their own experience.

                We can do that — due to some freak accident of evolution that probably has to do with the recursivity of language and the self-referential nature of subjective experience. And again, when I say “we,” I mean some humans sometimes. Many “wise” humans are just like the elephants.

                • theneverfox@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  What are you even saying? What evidence do you have?

                  That sounds like a bunch of unfounded nonsense to me.

                  Elephants seem to clearly understand life and death, cause and effect, who fucked them over and where they ran off to

                  I’d bet the average elephant has a better grasp on the meaning of life than the average human