• theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    What are you even saying? What evidence do you have?

    That sounds like a bunch of unfounded nonsense to me.

    Elephants seem to clearly understand life and death, cause and effect, who fucked them over and where they ran off to

    I’d bet the average elephant has a better grasp on the meaning of life than the average human

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        But that’s exactly what I’m saying. There are elephants out there contemplating morality. Even dogs do it, even if it’s massively based on the rules we impose on them

        Not math though. Math exists in the minds of humans, it doesn’t even exist in the universe. There is no two of anything, there’s one object and another similar object

        What does exist are ratios and harmonics, and animals have no problem understanding them

        • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          59 minutes ago

          Math exists in the minds of humans, [not animals].

          This is incorrect. Every animal we’ve ever researched, including insects like bees, can do arithmetic.

          Anyway, not a single one of the examples you’ve given involves second-order reasoning. These are all prosaic interactions with the environment, which is how most animas (yes, including dumb humans) experience the world.

          First-order reasoning: “What is moral?” Second-order reasoning: “Do moral beliefs constitute knowledge claims?”

          First-order reasoning: “One plus one is two.” Second-order reasoning: “number theory is either inconsistent or incomplete.”

          First-order reasoning: “What does this word mean?” Second-order reasoning: “How do words connect with their meanings?”

          The examples I gave you are extreme, but to be fair so is your confusion.

          • theneverfox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I believe that orcas are out there having philosophical debates and singing stories of their history and mythology that dates back even further than our own. I don’t think they’re doing math proofs, but if they are I’d be curious what base they use

            All the cutting edge science suggests we’re not special. We are not different in kind from animals

            Since science became a thing, we’ve been drawing lines between us and animals since we could no longer gesture to the soul. We’ve progressively disproven every single one. I’ve had this debate over various lines so many times

            It’s human arrogance