• dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There were fewer game breaking bugs though, since the developers knew they couldn’t be patched after release.

    • PunnyName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The game itself was smaller in virtually every way. Even if it took you 80 hours to beat, the data was nothing in comparison to modern games.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sure, but what I meant is that good developers took a lot of care in ensuring the game was ready for release, and companies like Nintendo and Sega did a lot of checks to ensure there were no major issues (for example, they’d keep it running for a long time while monitoring memory usage to ensure there were no memory leaks).

        These days, some games need a patch within the first week of release. Manufacturers have gotten lazier in terms of ensuring the game works properly, since they can just patch issues after release.

    • KISSmyOS@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For PC atleast, you could buy a magazine that came with a floppy disk containing patches.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wow I completely forgot about this. Later on it was CDs with both patches and demos.