im new to lemmy and i wanna know your perspective about ai

  • theherk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 hours ago

    glorified autocomplete

    People repeat that like it has some value, but it’s really just words. If autocomplete is glorified to the point of outputting something amazing, what is the value of saying it. I’m not saying it is, but if autocomplete spits out Shakespeare, “glorified autocomplete” is amazing.

    I mean, in a sense, brains are just glorified autocomplete. So…?

    • bluespin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s an apt description of how these models function. They predict the most likely response to the input based on their training data. A brain can grasp concepts and reason about them - an LLM cannot

      • theherk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It is a decent description for sure. But one without practical value. And yes brains can grasp concepts and reason, but by using a similar mechanism. One uses chemistry for electronic potential difference for neuron weights, but they are nevertheless more similar than one might think. Brains don’t have some supernatural special sauce; they are weighted neural networks.

        But again, I’m not saying the description is wrong. It just has no value. Glorified autocomplete can mean pretty amazing outputs. “Just glorified autocomplete” is diminutive without purpose.