Original Post:
I asked, concisely and simply, what was being hidden from us. Most of them just berated me, one user claimed the Syria conflict to which I provided a link to a recent UN Statement on which quite accurately reflected the conflict start to finish. Another user claimed that the recently declassified Nixon era documents about the Chilean revolution and coup, but I was able to find a 1973 archived Newspaper accusing the Nixon Admin of having a hand in it from Times Magazine meaning it was already a mainstream theory at the time.
So you’re admitting you have a vendetta and were commenting on that post in bad faith, as I have been saying. You were never interested in an answer in the first place, you just were looking for a fight.
I asked knowing you couldn’t answer, and I was proven right.
You’re still just defining “bad faith argument”
If you had an answer then the question would have helped you make your point and spread your beliefs. Because you could not answer, it hurt your stance. That’s not bad faith, that’s just your skill issue.
If someone is there obviously to antagonize people, then there really isn’t a point in any engagement with them other than mirroring their bullshit for entertainment. You can keep saying how dumb I am that I don’t have an answer to the question but I also don’t know who you are and don’t give a single fuck if you think I’m dumb or not. I’ll waste your time like you’re trying to waste others with bullshit bait questions.
People don’t have to agree with you in order to have a fair and honourable debate.
Again, no point when the person is doing it in bad faith, as you have already admitted.