I have pondered anarchism, but I believe it will always descend into feudalism, totalitarianism, or the formation of a government by those who seek power. Anarchism will only be possible through an extreme apocalypse, it’s impossible so long as those who remember how things were still exist.
Ultimately I choose not to label myself as anything, it’s all distractions. The only thing that truly matters to identify is class, everything else is pointless.
I’ll consider reading more of it, but for now I’m reading the Quran, then the hadiths, then the Satanic Verses.
No, though some aspects are shared.
Liberalism has very different views in terms of economics.
that’s true, I don’t agree with liberal economics
To me, at least, you sound a lot more anarchist than you might realize.
I recommend reading up on some - Dorothy Day, Lucy Parsons, Noam Chomsky, Robert Wolff.
Remember it’s a philosophy, not a method of government.
I have pondered anarchism, but I believe it will always descend into feudalism, totalitarianism, or the formation of a government by those who seek power. Anarchism will only be possible through an extreme apocalypse, it’s impossible so long as those who remember how things were still exist.
Ultimately I choose not to label myself as anything, it’s all distractions. The only thing that truly matters to identify is class, everything else is pointless.
I’ll consider reading more of it, but for now I’m reading the Quran, then the hadiths, then the Satanic Verses.