• peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    What? Where did you get that?

    The trial part? I said it would look like a trial. The community is self-governing so the community would have to be involved in agreeing with the consequences.

    • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Well when I think of a trial I think of laws and statutes and torts and legislation that go along with legal proceedings.

      So is it basically mega democracy where everyone gets involved? how will the majority ensure the minority will be protected? like that pesky john family who refuse to let us eat their dogs?

      • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Yes it is a mega democracy.

        Anarchy can only exist when everyone is at an equitable level.

        Minority oppression arises from someone becoming an authority. That someone could be an organization that has formed, and that organization would have to be dismantled.

        Edit: also - anarchists believe in property possession, rather than ownership. So you would not be entitled to eat anyone’s dogs but your own. How they got the dogs isn’t of importancez what is of importance is who is feeding and caring for them.

        • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          hm. tangibly related, but I’m curious what you think of the Plurbs from Pluribus, if you’ve seen that show. Is perfect anarchism peace on Earth?