idk why I kinda cringe every time…

  • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    I don’t mind the use of chess as a shorthand for ‘battle of wits’ but I object to how badly written they usually are. Bad Genius hasn’t noticed, and isn’t expecting, a Queen sacrifice move by Good Genius? Please.

    As bad as poker. Every round of poker in movies is a smorgasbord of high value hands:

    “But can you beat a full house, Queens over nines?”
    “I also have a full house, Kings over Jacks.”
    “I have four 10s.”
    “I have a Royal Flush.”
    “I have six Aces.”

    Everyone gasps!

    • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      That poker hands reminded me of the episode in Malcolm in the Middle where they’re playing and suddenly realize there are 6 5s in the deck

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      This always bothers me so much! It always comes down to one hand, and it’s ALWAYS presented prior to the deal, that this is the hand that has to win, and the hero gets a royal flush.

      Oh wow. He got REALLY lucky and it required no skill at all. 🙄

    • neidu3@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      As someone who plays a lot of chess, (10-20 matches per day, one day I might get decent at it), a queen sacrifice is not a big whoop, and I doubt it would result in any audible gasps from an audience if there were spectators. Those who are dorky enough to watch chess (that includes myself) knows this.

      As for movie-poker, a movie named Maverick comes to mind (Mel Gibson, iirc)