• themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Literally every sentence you typed is entirely inaccurate. It’s bad science promoted by bigots to create a convinient lie that permits them to discriminate and oppress people.

    Edit to add: It’s even a bad interpretation of the metaphor. It’s like saying “akshually, there’s only two atomic particles, the proton and the electron, and these are the only two particles that determine charge, so there’s really only two types of atoms, positive and negative charged atoms, and that’s why black people don’t deserve civil rights.”

    That’s you. That’s what you sound like.

    • Human genders are not defined by gamete types.
    • Human sex is not defined by gamete types. There are women born with testes, and men born with ovaries. Secondary sexual characteristics are influenced by hormones as much as genetics, and the presence of a gamete does not determine the hormones in a person’s body.
    • Sexual development charts are generalizations across average humans, and do not necessarily represent any one individual’s sexual development. Everyone does not fit into a box.
    • You can’t hide your bigotry behind peer-reviewed biology papers and textbooks. The actual science doesn’t support it.
    • Gonochorism is not relevant to the psychosexual development of humans. It’s a term used to differentiate animals that change sexes due to environmental factors, like alligators and snails. Nobody is claiming that transgender individuals are simultaneously hermaphroditic. It’s a biological strawman argument that belies the insincerity of your argument.

    In short, fuck off with your nazi bullshit.

    • powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      You’re mostly arguing with what you want me to have said and not what I’ve said so there’s not much point in responding to much of your post.

      Your claims that “Human sex is not defined by gamete types” and “The actual science doesn’t support it” are incorrect though

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Which is it, you don’t want to defend the nazi argument, or you do want to defend the nazi argument?

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I feel like I was fairly clear about that. It’s the one where you use bad science to justify bigotry and crimes against humanity. For example, your comment earlier in this thread about how certain people shouldn’t exist because ova and sperm are the only gametes.

              • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 hours ago

                See what you’re doing now is called sea-lioning, where you pretend you have been misunderstood, and you’re just trying to have a civil conversation. You shared a nazi arguement, and if you feel you’ve been misunderstood, you’re free to clarify what you meant to say. I’ve said my peace, so if you want to keep pretending you’re not a bigot, then you’ll need to do more than insist others prove it.