Apologies for poetic license in the name of brevity.
The problem with your thinking is that you thought I used the term homeostasis as if it meant unchanging, rather than the dynamic rebalancing that keeps a system viable. The system being the ecosphere.
the planet is a lot more likely to survive than humans are.
My point exactly. The planet is a rock. The ecosphere is a complex system that is in deep, deep trouble. It’s only a problem if you value humanity and the flora and fauna that nurtured us into existance. It seems you don’t.
The flaw in this thinking is that massive destruction and extinction is one of the ways natural systems maintain themselves.
The earth has never been in homeostasis, 99.9% of species are extinct, and the planet is a lot more likely to survive than humans are.
our conduct is perfectly natural and playing out a lot faster than most natural systems that take millions of years to extinct a species sometimes
Apologies for poetic license in the name of brevity.
The problem with your thinking is that you thought I used the term homeostasis as if it meant unchanging, rather than the dynamic rebalancing that keeps a system viable. The system being the ecosphere.
My point exactly. The planet is a rock. The ecosphere is a complex system that is in deep, deep trouble. It’s only a problem if you value humanity and the flora and fauna that nurtured us into existance. It seems you don’t.