I mean getting more than a 3rd of the population to watch anything at the same time is pretty much impossible at this point. The Superbowl in the US is the closest thing to a unifying cultural moment but the monoculture still continues to fade.
Thinking that’s low is insane. What other thing can you get more than 1/3 of the nation to participate in? Personally, I didn’t watch it, and I never do. From my perspective, 1/3 seems high, not low.
It typically costs to watch it. I saw it live from Nashville’s local Hispanic channel though, only by chance did I see it, and thought it would go off right when the game started. I still have no idea how they got the Super Bowl for free.
Wait, that’s 38% of the US population. That’s actually way less than I would have expected with how much it’s hyped online.
That actually seems really high to me.
I mean getting more than a 3rd of the population to watch anything at the same time is pretty much impossible at this point. The Superbowl in the US is the closest thing to a unifying cultural moment but the monoculture still continues to fade.
The most shared cultural event in the US is sitting on a couch, eating junk food and watching ads for 4 hours.
I didn’t say it was good lol
Thinking that’s low is insane. What other thing can you get more than 1/3 of the nation to participate in? Personally, I didn’t watch it, and I never do. From my perspective, 1/3 seems high, not low.
The soccer euro- and worldcups often draw like 50% in many countries.
It typically costs to watch it. I saw it live from Nashville’s local Hispanic channel though, only by chance did I see it, and thought it would go off right when the game started. I still have no idea how they got the Super Bowl for free.
I wonder if that counts those of us who watched it after the fact on the official YouTube posting?