• Kacarott@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I don’t think It’s that clear, are eggs named by what created them, or what they contain? I could certainly see an argument that the first chicken hatched from a proto-chicken egg

    • Kraiden@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Ok, but does it matter what it’s called? If it contains a modern chicken, and it’s an egg, whether it’s a chicken egg, or a proto chicken egg is debatable. But the egg definitely came first

      • Kacarott@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Not if we are specifically asking about whether the chicken or the chicken egg came first (which is what the original comment in this chain implied), because if proto-chickens lay proto-chicken eggs and a chicken was hatched out of one, then the chicken came before the chicken egg

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I always love to bring up that this boils down to an argument about definitions, given the assumption we’re talking about chicken eggs.