original, saw this somewhere else too. ddos stuff. this one blames ru for archive.today mess. sounds about right. didn’ intend it to look like an announcement here. it kind of did. post based on ars story, apparently. who knows

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is understandable, but at the same time, none of the anti-paywall lists are as good as archive.today. They actually have paid accounts at a bunch of paywalled sites, and use them when scraping.

    • CombatWombat@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      86
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unfortunately, they’ve allegedly modified the contents of some archived articles, so even though they may do better to archive, nothing archived is of any value because it cannot be trusted.

      • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        So are they removing all other websites that post lies or modify their articles to suit their narrative at times?

        Fox news? MSN? CNN? BBC? Reuters? AP?

        Why the sudden urge to validate the archives? How many articles have been proven to be modified?

        Seems like they’ve been wanting to remove an entity the empire doesn’t control and they’re using this as a cover to do it.

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        What if somebody used archive.today to bypass a paywall and then archived that using Web Archive? (So we’re sure the content stays the same)