• ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Are you saying that because they would get more upvotes, they could offset the downvotes they receive? Potentially, but this is where the second metric comes in (giving a lot of downvotes), and as we said, the two are almost always present at the same time.

    Right, though it’s a mitigating factor. I guess there’s something I don’t know about piefed: Lemmy comments all have a default upvote from the user that makes it. But it can be revoked by the user. Does Piefed work the same way? My thought only applies if that’s the case.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That’s an interesting example of a user this is designed for/around.

        The general system of up/downvotes seems to be doing its job quite as intended: their views appear routinely unpopular and there’s a seemingly pretty strong community consensus around that.

        It looks like their threads have comments that solidly and clearly refute the garbage manosphere stuff. For some people it’s the opportunity to express a refutation of it publicly and directly. The public viewer gets to read those responses too.

        So with that example: what do the flags do that the content of their posts don’t already communicate?

        • Blaze@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          So with that example: what do the flags do that the content of their posts don’t already communicate?

          It warns other users that this commenter may be a bad faith user / troll.

          Usually when I encounter a troll, I check their profile to see if they are indeed a troll. The warning saves some time on that, and is accurate the vast majority of the time.