Objectification, hate, rape threats: the politicians debating online abuse mean well, but to truly understand, they need to see what I see

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    from the country that checks social media history at the border to make sure you didn’t say anything bad about the Dear Leader

    That’s also illegal. A rational person would argue to prevent that. An irrational person would suggest that it justifies the regulation of even more speech by an already fascist govt.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Genuinely asking here: do you think the word “illegal” means wrong?

      By definition, if a sovereign government decides it’s allowed to do something, it’s not illegal. You could say it’s unethical (though I’m not sure why you would), but you can’t say it’s illegal.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        Genuinely asking here: do you think the word “illegal” means wrong?

        …no? But I think in this particular instance, obviously yes.

        if a sovereign government decides it’s allowed to do something, it’s not illegal

        …wat? Why would that be illegal?