I’ll take being a calculator, it really did resolve my main issues with debian
Interesting. I use Mint. I’m not a Methodist.
My wife on the other hand is a Methodist lay speaker so…
Unfortunately I belong to Windows denomination
Every time I come on here I see another distro I haven’t heard about. This time it was Puppy Linux.
Hannah Montana Linux is still the goat
I’ve seen that one.
It’s a classic!
Linux Distro
Windows 11, macOS, and FreeBSD on the list
Wat
Think about it a little more…
A prosperity gospel church is still a church, unless you’re referring to WSL as the equivalent of “Linux”.
I do not consider those churches to be Christian. Their theology is significantly removed from orthoxy that it’s unrecognizable.
But even still, as with WSL, you can find some Christianity in there if you work really hard to find it.
Exhibit 9370 supporting officially renaming the “no true Scotsman” logical fallacy to “no true Christian”
If only Christians centuries ago agreed on a basic statement that could define what is orthodox Christianity…
Heaven’s Gate: TempleOS
I disagree. You have MacOS as “Spiritual but not Religious”.
MacOS is Hillsong.
Also, many of these are not Christian, and many of these are not Linux.
MacOS is Hillsong.
I can see that.
Also, many of these are not Christian, and many of these are not Linux.
I’m aware.
Unitarian UniversalismTo stick to the theme of my chart, since Unitarian Universalism is non-trinitarian it would likely need to be a Unix-like OS that isn’t Linux. I would give it OpenSolaris. (And that’s a compliment.)
I think several on your chart don’t believe in the Trinity? Pretty sure LDS, JW, and at least some Pentecostal? I think they all self-identify as Christian, though, but some Unitarians might not? Is that the difference?
That’s my exact thought process. I put LDS at Android because they do identify as Christian, but we are really stretching the definition of what technically counts as Christian.
Honestly I don’t know as much as I ought to about UU, but I didn’t think that they generally identify as Christian.
I looked up Lineage and see it’s also an Android variant. What’s the Pentecostal logo?
Pentecostal is KaOS.
A built-from-scratch Linux that doesn’t rely on any of the other branches and just does is own kinda specific thing. (You can probably suggest something better. I was kinda running out of ideas for that one.)
I freaking loved Opensolaris!, so that works too!
Running Fedora, was raised Presbyterian. 🤯
It’s immutable.
Your distro chose you.
First up: FreeBSD is NOT a Linux distribution, and secondly, is NetBSD so small that it is nowhere to be found?
Berkeley software distribution ≠ Linux (or gnu+Linux, which is btw not true for all distros.)
Bro u r duuuuuuuumb (wanna kiss?)
Indeed, my love
That’s part of the joke.
When was Windows 11, Lineage/Android, MacOS or a fucking TI calculator a proper Linux distro
Lineage/Android
Only the kernel is called Linux. The userspace is completely different from GNU/Linux but the actual software named Linux is being used. Alpine Linux isn’t GNU/Linux either.
Is CachyOS Unitarian Universalist? Or watching church on TV on Sunday morning?
I think NixOS might be Unitarian Universalist. Dreamed up in a doctoral thesis, seems neat, half a dozen ways to do anything (none of which are truly wrong), access to all the packages in the world, terrible documentation.
ReactOS should be mormonism
It’s not Linux, thus not even “Christian”I just noticed, that the scheme also includes e.g. “Atheism” and “pagan”, which aren’t Christian denominations either.
Well to be fair, atheism and pagan also are assigned to non-Linux OSes here.
Yes, the title of the scheme is confusing.
I really thought more people in this group would get that joke.
If I go distro->religion then I guess I’m Orthodox.
If I go religion->distro then I guess I need to start using a TI graphing calculator.
If you use Slack then you are probably a person that finds benefit in self-inflicted struggles. You seriously might find benefit and meaning in the Orthodox Church.
FreeBSD is definitely Satanism
It’s very Christian to not understand the difference.
Wait, ChromeOS was explicitly created to support the institution of chattel slavery? Who knew?!
Sounds about right to me.
It was created by google. That’s not impossible or even particularly improbable
