• doug@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    sadly I’ll likely support them through any shitty decisions they make as they are the only viable non-chromium alternative these days.

    I get they’re chasing the buck and trying to stay relevant, but uhhhh… if they could be less Steve Buscemi-teen about it, that’d be great.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I strongly believe that the EU should fund Mozilla, or a fork of Firefox.

      Gecko is the only viable competitor to Blink/WebKit, and it is needed

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Govts around the world should be funding all sorts of FOSS projects. I know they do to some degree but not much. It benefits the whole world and only hurts big tech.

          • hraegsvelmir@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Firefox is just the browser, Mozilla is the organization constantly wasting money on features Firefox’s users are actively hostile to in a bid to tempt away people already using Chrome. Not the OP, but I’d be down to donate to Firefox’s development directly, but I wouldn’t want to make a donation to Mozilla hoping it would go toward Firefox, only to find out they took my money to build some new LLM integration that nobody asked for, only to sit unused for years before being quietly shuttered in favor of the new tech buzzword of the day.

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Last time I tried Waterfox some sites like Twitch that actively block usage on old browsers, refused to work because the latest Waterfox release was based on a Firefox like 20+ builds behind.

        Firefox was on like version 142 and the latest Waterfox download was based on build 128.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Waterfox right now is built on ESR 148, which is on par with the latest Firefox release! ESR releases will lag several versions behind, but that’s normal (even on Mozilla’s side), and I’d be kind of shocked if it was such a big gap

          Edit: there was a big gap. 128 to 140 was the right jump, but Waterfox non-betas took a little less than two months to implement the change after Mozilla released it.

          • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Well you clearly haven’t used the standard available download (non-beta/nightly release) consistently through last year. Waterfox was using ESR 128 since October 2024, kept that base until finally upgrading to ESR 140 last August. So that’s nearly a year of its base being out of date. So the user agent reported that number… sites really don’t like that since they’re looking at that for support.

            https://www.waterfox.com/releases/6.5.0/ https://www.waterfox.com/releases/6.6.0/

            Twitch only supports the last TWO versions of Firefox officially and will actively block logging in from older versions. So while you might be able to watch Twitch, if you aren’t already logged in, you won’t be able to login.

            https://help.twitch.tv/s/article/supported-browsers?language=en_US

            There are thousands of posts about it online for Waterfox other forks.

      • pipe01@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        If everyone switched from firefox to waterfox, Mozilla would kill firefox which would in turn will waterfox

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      17 hours ago

      This is probably common knowledge to you and many others, but it bears repeating: You cannot donate to fund the development of Mozilla Firefox.

      Google can, unfortunately.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Yeah ofc they are chasing the buck.

      It’s either they find alternatives revenue streams or we no longer have Firefox as a viable alternative anymore.

      Browsers development is crazy engineering heavy, and thus, expensive.

      It’s a shitty situation all around.

      • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The ladybird devs are currently in the process of switching language again from Swift to Rust, using LLMs.

        • t3rminus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Yup. Don’t use or support Ladybird, especially since it’s made by anti-inclusivity “keep your ‘political’ gender-neutral pronouns out of our READMEs” nerdbros.

          On the other hand, Servo is coming along nicely.