How a single hack infected the world’s most important operating system.

  • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I think you’re being pretty reductive here.

    I agree his videos are usually mediocre, but as a cyber security professional I actually think this one did a good job of simplifying and explaining computer security fundamentals at a level that most can understand.

    You and I have a ton of extra context that the average person does not, so that Wikipedia article might suffice, but the video covers far more than that Wikipedia article.

    They clearly did more research than just reading that article, and they went to the trouble of reproducing some of the steps in the attack to demonstrate the danger it posed. This isn’t just a brainless regurgitation of the Wikipedia article as you’re implying.

    • TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Veritasium partnered up with a private equity firm around the time his videos became far more sensationalist and I don’t think that’s a coincidence. His videos have become far more misleading and willing to stretch the truth for views in the past few years, so I simply stopped watching his stuff and don’t trust his content.

      https://www.electrify.video/news/electrify-completes-majority-investment-in-veritasium

      • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        That’s fair enough. If you lead with this I wouldn’t have commented. I agree his recent videos have been more sensationalist, I just thought this one was pretty good, especially for the non-technical crowd.

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I’ve found his videos pretty on point in the topics that I’m familiar with.

          I’d need more evidence of misleading information than ‘A popular content creator receives an investment’. That’s not proof.

          It’s not even implied by the evidence presented outside of an implied conspiracy not built on anything other than a press release.

          There may be evidence of foul play somewhere, but it was not presented here.