Sharing is ethical only through corporate approved channels!

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Well because it would be akin to taking away the ability to right click from an operating system. It’s been basic functionality for many years and would enrage hundreds of millions of users and drive them to another browser over night.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Firefox, one of its forks, or one of the up and coming ones. Or webkit based ones. Or if on apple, safari.

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Are you comfortable actually pointing to those as realistic alternatives for most everybody?

          I see endless rows of corporate silos and a couple of niche little hobbiest communities off to the side, I do not see an environment where corporations can’t do whatever the hell they want.

          Don’t get me wrong, I hope I am wrong, but I don’t think I am.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Absolutely yes. I would recommend Firefox to any and every person complaining about chrome. And for times they have to use chrome, there are alternatives that do various amounts of degoogling. Almost certainly one would be able to reinstate copy/paste.