• SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This is perhaps a controversial statement from someone who is fed up with all this age verification stuff, but having the user age be set on account creation (without providing ID or anything dumb like that) doesn’t seem that bad.

    It just feels like a way to standardise parental controls. Instead of having to roll their own age verification stuff, software like Discord can rely on the UserAccountStorage value.

    If it were possible to plug into a browser in a standard, privacy conscious way, it also reduces the need for third party parental control browser extensions, which I imagine can be a bit sketchy.

    OSes collect and expose language and locale information anyway. What harm is age bands in addition to that?

    • Pappabosley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Currently it’s self reported, but if it’s complied with and then they inevitably say now it needs id they can just block all the self reports until id is provided. This is the same tactic of marginally moving the line that has been happening for years

    • brokenwing@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      If somehow age verification is mandated everywhere, this I could get behind. It would be like saying you’re 18+ on a porn website.