• Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    55 minutes ago

    I’m so sick of hearing about this, and seeing people who don’t want to read get upset.

    This is preemptively combating future federal crackdown by allowing Californians to TELL THE OS ANY BIRTH DATE THEY Want. No ID, no pictures of faces.

  • runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    this will be just as effective as the age checker on steam. Everyone is born Jan 1st. 19xx where 19xx=how far a couple scroll wheels gets you.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    A direct result of libs endlessly crying for state control of the internet.

    Enjoy your zionist TikTok and state-controled Linux!

    Liberalism <—> Fascism.

  • credo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The only way this can be implemented at the OS level (not the vendor level) is to put in whatever date you want. That includes any notion of scanning “IDs”.

    If you want to setup a kid’s account on a phone or pc, then you have the control. If they are smart enough to do it themselves, then hey- don’t hold them back.

    My immediate concern is giving sites additional fingerprinting material. The OS better not give away an actual birthdate- when they can option for adult/not-adult, etc. Next concern is moving the age verification to a corporation, at which point the dystopia is real.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Next concern is moving the age verification to a corporation, at which point the dystopia is real.

      The state is bad enough. Selling us off to a subsidiary will be just another insult.

  • Cherry@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I feel like I wanna walk away from the internet for my personal life.

    The second problem is just how much has moved online for example processing documents (your passport etc) same as when you have issues there’s no number to ring the store.

    So it’s not like we are totally able to. We need to turn it back to how it was. They said use the internet because it made life efficient. We need to take that back.

    • MyRobotShitsBolts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This has been a long time coming, a perfect example of the frog in in the pot; well, the water is boiling now.

      I will not comply with any of this. No website or service or app or app store is getting my ID. I know I wont be the only one, and the system has removed so many manual ways of doing things that those of us who refuse will bring the system to a grinding halt. It will not be easy and life will be made more difficult for us, but it will also be for them.

      We must all resist this in every way we can.

      • Cherry@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s gonna have to be that way. I saw something here the other day saying they couldn’t check a parcel delivery without an app. Someone suggested emailing daily for an update. I aspire to be that petty.

    • bisby@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I had to have a friend help me because a company I bought from only did customer support through Instagram.

  • bonenode@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The nudge at Norway in the end is a bit strange. They oppose enshitification. Age checks could be part of that but I wouldn’t say it is a given. I’d rather look at the Norwegian government’s stance on privacy in the internet, not sure what it is.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I hate the idea of age checks, but OS is the next best thing if they don’t share the information beyond. In truth it is pointless other than tracking people.

      • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The real answer is to swap it. Make websites have a tag for the type of content they contain. Browsers can then be configured to allow/disallow different types.

        You get a way better version of the same claimed benefit of parental controls (that we know is a lie in the current version), and we aren’t forcing our identification to be uploaded to major hacking target sites with questionable security

      • Sir Arthur V Quackington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        10 hours ago

        “If”

        They will. Once the age check at an OS level is implemented, the next level is to enforce that this check then use a verification service. And then to make this information available to sites upon access.

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          How would you even implement it otherwise?

          (Well actually, you as a parent would be an admin, and create appropriate accounts for your children, and any third party would trust that age number set on that user account, thus pushing the burden back on the parent to properly parent. But they won’t do that because this isn’t really the point here.)

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Well the way I view it is it’s all useless. If a 10 year old goes to buy a phone, they can’t do so without getting money from an adult who therefore approved of it. If a 15 year old buys a cell phone they can’t… Because they need an adult to have a credit card/bank that allows monthly payments. Only offered to an adult. If you are a minor you can only get one with an adults co-sign. Thus the idea that a child has access to the Internet without an adults consent is just untrue 99.9 percent of the time. schools monitor the traffic . So every situation comes down to negligence on the parent. Who will sign their account in, or their credit card on the kids phone… bypassing all reason for the laws

        • LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I 100% agree. Then there will be different (mandatory) verification services. Some will be paid, but the free ones (ran by Microslop and Google) that will sell all your personal data to their 500+ closest affiliates.

          Ultimately, the end game will be certain websites (like your Bank) won’t trust your identity because your using some FOSS verification service and as “they take security seriously” will require you to use MS or Google.

          • Tim_Bisley@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Ultimately, the end game will be certain websites (like your Bank) won’t trust your identity because your using some FOSS verification service and as “they take security seriously” will require you to use MS or Google.

            You can see parts of this already. When I’m browsing the web in Linux I get hot with way more captcha checks when accessing websites than when using Windows.

            • astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Even moreso with ad-blocker and PiHole. I swear that every corporate website has me do a captcha of some kind every time I click a link.

              On that note, just denying trackers breaks SO many email links, and it feels like it gets worse and worse each year.

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          8 hours ago

          “Once everyone has a credit card they will ban cash so that every transaction can be tracked”

          “Once every phone has GPS they will make it mandatory to send your location to the government at all times.”

          “Once everyone has a car they will make walking illegal”

          “Once everyone has an ID they will make it mandatory to scan it on every step”

          “If you let gays get married people will marry their pets next”

          Do those thing ever come true at all? Other than US being a fascist state run by corporations, did any country managed to pull off this slippery slope type trick? From what I see people either consent to being tracked in exchange for likes on social media or governments simply push mass face renegotiation and tracking (like in UK) without any sort of “step by step, boiling frog” type bullshit.

          • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I agree with you, but the cash example is a bad one because there is a push to move entirely to electronic payments.

            • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I mean at least the cars thing is pretty legitimately true.

              Only in US. Many things are fucked up in US for many different reasons. People support it because of brainwashing. It’s not slipped trough without anyone noticing.