If the money is right or I loved the work, yes.

K, thanks.

I don’t know.

So they will avoid doing things if how they look doing them isn’t how they want to look?

Similar. Do they not?

Uh…k…not sure which part do that relates to my question?

So…no? Not beleiving they can be pretty does discourage girls from choosing to do things?

Shouldn’t the comparison be ‘won’t’, not ‘can’t’?

Girls wont want to do a thing unless they can look pretty?

It does call into question the motive of the archive and it’s financial viability to pivot to doing that.

That might be a viable option.

Copyright should not apply to a historic record, but things don’t become historic record upon creation, but sometime after. However, you can’t have a historic record if it isn’t recording history as it happens so…once enough time passes to make a historic record case versus copyright how do you add back the stuff that wasn’t recorded at the time?

The removal of this content is itself now historic record so tag the missing information and why there is a black hole where the record should be. Digital history, and thus history, as swiss cheese because the value of copyright matters more than accuracy of the history of the digital age itself. It is a tragedy to the future that we can’t record reality because someone claims they own it…

We are a stupid, stupid species.

Books are less valuable than a record of the state of the digital space, through time.

If they can, they will. That’s the only rule you need to know about business and politics.

Why are we so seemingly obsessed with assigning thing into ethnic/race groups?

And does ChatGPT make the situation better or worse?

Because you never fucking stop them.

My thought as well. But since space and time are one thing, night heavy spending energy?

“I just want you to listen, stop trying to fix it!”

To the extent they are able, relative to their need. You are clearly far more able than a lot of parents who aren’t well off, like you.