If you ask ChatGPT, it says it’s guidelines include not giving the impression it’s a human. But if you ask it be less human because it is confusing you, it says that would break the guidelines.

Having insecurities is a problem?

Devaluing human labour, in a labour economy, is a direct attack on the working class. It is, and has always been, class warfare. The working class simply refuse to accept it.

You’re not dumb, we are all being brainwashed into sticking our asses in the air and convinced we won’t get fucked.

I really wish people would realize the level of dependency, and thus leverage, these companies have encouraged us to give them, before they learn it first hand.

Would it be funny if you didn’t agree with part of it?

Can I get disappointed at the underlying cruelty of making jokes about people’s insecurities?

People have different preferences in different situations, is that a bad thing somehow?

It’s ok to hurt these people?

Then why is it funny?

Interesting that her partner isn’t Lebron James in the analogy. He also needs a team to win so she could have said, even Lebon James needs team mates to win the game. But she didn’t, she relegated her partner to the less valuable role, wonder what that choice indicates…

Yet you can’t specify any that aren’t covered by orgasm or intimacy?

What part are you playing, that is as equally meaningful as being the direct stimulus that is necessary for orgasm, that isn’t also present when one is the direct stimulus? Being what brings a woman to orgasm is about as meaningful as it gets when it to comes to sex, next to the intimacy.

I did, that’s how I know.

Then she doesn’t need the vibrator…

Is never being why she orgasms a turn on?

If men had to jerk themselves off after piv just to cum, women would not take that well, just saying.

That’s ridiculous. It absolutely matters.

And to be why it’s fun…otherwise…why be there?

So…no…or?