Yeah…that’s it…bots…you don’t want to associate all the post history and behavioral data with a real live person and connect whatever data you can find on the open data market with the same real person, collating everything the internet knows about a person into a single profile, destroying anonymity completely, ushering in a new age of Internet censorship and repression and aiding the identification of target groups for political and commercial exploitation? Nah…you wouldn’t want to do that, would you?

That’s a power thing. Avoiding accountability to the rule of law.

The female gaze.

The places tyrants can’t see into is where the threats come from.

Privacy is proof of terrorism. The state, and it’s corporate allies, need to have access to your innermost thoughts, the things about you even you don’t know, for national security reasons. This is totally normal and not something to resist. Vote republican.

He’s made billions more after and because of it so he doesn’t give a shit about a meaningless, billion dollar fine.

It has the threshold its victims allow by maintaining a relationship with the greedy.

This is a lot of what’s happening. LLM companies have convinced the eagerly selfish that LLMs can empower them to do things they currently rely on others for, faster and better, and the early adopters are making very risky decisions that are blowing up in their faces. The current US admin is one of these groups of eagerly selfish, believing LLMs will empower them to be capable of things they simply aren’t, like seizing power and ruling America forever.

That’s all of business through.

Yeah, you do seem a bit defensive.

Oh look, the massive ego of women.

Still gonna use it to enslave and possibly enable a culling of the world population.

They are becoming one, united against us.

Does this include ever mob in an RPG that drops random loot? Like all of World of Warcraft?

Because it has little to do with protecting anyone and is another gross violation of privacy to serve corporate interests.

Good thing YouTube itself is skippable.

Because they form their worldview around their own interests, without realizing it. The label of progressive does a lot to assume moral right and inclusiveness which hides biases of self interest. Many of the beleifs people hold were not formed from the effort of reasoning by them but adopted from the authority of progressive ideology. Religion works in much the same way. It takes concerted effort, emotional regulation and sacrifice to build a rational and consistent worldview which is something most people, even progressives, rarely attempt.

Men have so much less reason to fear compared to women.

I do not agree this can be assumed.

Just because one person doesn’t experience something doesn’t invalid that others do, even when a majority do.

What’s so insane about it?

I agree that women have and will likely continue to be, physically vulnerable to larger people, most often from those whom are men, because they more often bigger. Women suffer from this vulnerability in a variety of ways, including sexual assault. That risk, and the severity of the consequences, deserves community effort to mitigate.

Where’s the insane part?