The same thing happened on land until we murdered everything.

They control the means of distribution and accreditation of science publishing. Business should not be trusted to control anything.

But the world exists to satisfy the every growing ambitions of the people who can gain control of those resources. They don’t exist for humanity, life or the planet, but for the egos of the powerful. /s, but not really

Mgl, not paying attention to subreddit names and treating everything like I’m swimming through a sea of floating ideas, when posting, is part of why I’m on Lemmy today. Reddit’s sadistic mods didn’t like it much.

We are just things to these people, to be used and based as they please.

This is admirable behavior?

We all learned the lesson but the people who could implement the lesson refuse to because it isn’t to their personal advantage. We all know what the wise thing to do is but that would disempower some very rich and influential people who should never have been allowed to grow to be so influential over the state, aka us, that we can’t stop them from forcing us to pay for their speculative risk taking.

They forced massive shifts across the economy and wasted massive resources chasing a speculative technology all for power. We all suffer because of this and the government refuses to deal with it because we elect business friendly, ambitious liars.

They learn how to profit the next time.

Too big to fail is too big to exist. Break them up.

Never actually heard of it.

What am I dependent on to access by stuff if I use a passkey? A smart phone?

If the money is right or I loved the work, yes.

K, thanks.

I don’t know.

So they will avoid doing things if how they look doing them isn’t how they want to look?

Similar. Do they not?

Uh…k…not sure which part do that relates to my question?

So…no? Not beleiving they can be pretty does discourage girls from choosing to do things?

Shouldn’t the comparison be ‘won’t’, not ‘can’t’?