Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for privacy. But between setting up the birthdate when creating my children’s local account on their computers, and having to send a copy of their ID to every platform under the sun, I’d easily chose the former.

I’d even agree to a simple protocol (HTTP X-Over-18 / X-Over-21 headers?) to that.

  • olivier@lemmy.fait.chOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just because they are responsible doesn’t mean the have the means to exert their responsibility. Demanding birth-date upon (local) account creation would allow them to better exert that responsiblity.

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      no it wont. kids get around shit easier than ever especially with luddite parents.

      if the gov actually cared they’d take to charging using existing laws.

      • Womble@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Parents of current 8-18 year olds are gen X and millenials, who every survey shows are (on average) significantly more tech literate than gen Z and Alpha.

        • flandish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          correct. i am a gen x software engineer and I know for a fact my kid who is now 25 would always find ways around firewalls when he was 14 and horned up.

          my point is that we have laws already that are perfectly appropriate to the “concern” stated, “child safety.”

          any new laws will only give more access to important data to corporations who are known to do bad things with it.

          that does not make it worth it. my opinion would change if there was a legit large inrush of charges using exiting laws that then did nothing to help, then one could argue we need more law. but thats just not the case today.