Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for privacy. But between setting up the birthdate when creating my children’s local account on their computers, and having to send a copy of their ID to every platform under the sun, I’d easily chose the former.

I’d even agree to a simple protocol (HTTP X-Over-18 / X-Over-21 headers?) to that.

  • Skavau@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The effort from a Linux team here would amount to little more than a “are you 18 yes/no” and there’s no way that would be considered good enough down the line if not now.

    • notabot@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yet, with the way the California bill is written, so long as that data was collected at account creation, it would be adaquate.

        • notabot@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          That’s one bit that I do think could do with clarifying. As written resposibility seems to be split between the developer and the controller. From the rest of the bill, it seems like the developer is in the clear if the system functions, and it’s down to the computer controller to ensure users are correctly set up.