Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for privacy. But between setting up the birthdate when creating my children’s local account on their computers, and having to send a copy of their ID to every platform under the sun, I’d easily chose the former.

I’d even agree to a simple protocol (HTTP X-Over-18 / X-Over-21 headers?) to that.

  • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Lots of the criticisms will eventually start sounding like seatbelt law opponents. Lots of “it should be optional, if you want to do it that’s fine but don’t force me to, I feel safer without it, it’s each individual’s responsibility and shouldn’t be mandated, etc” types of arguments.

    The problem with the current implementation is that it isn’t done privately. There are several ways to do secure and private age verifications, where your device never passes your browsing history off to the government, and the individual sites never get your personal info. But lawmakers have been lobbied by companies who want to insert themselves as the age verifiers to skim your data. So the current laws being passed are written in such a way that they’ll result in massive privacy violations.

    If opponents truly wanted to prevent privacy violations, they would be devising ways to get lawmakers on board with secure age verification. That way the laws would actually reflect best practices, and wouldn’t just result in less privacy. But they’re still trapped in the knee jerk “but my privacy” reactions, which shuts down any further discussion and leaves the door wide open for lobbyists to write and pass whatever legislation they want.

    • Skavau@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s not just a privacy issue. Regulatory capture is a problem too. It encumbers small services to the point where they can’t afford to exist, and the only winners are the walled gardens. And it’s also logistically an impossible thing to attempt to regulate at scale.

      • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        44 seconds ago

        That isn’t a problem with proper implementation. Not that it will be done properly, just that it can be done properly

    • Trilogy3452@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Are we sure parental control methods were proven to be fundamentally inadequate for the situation? There’s no bulletproof security method to guard this data, so the discussion is about weighing privacy loss vs child safety, against existing methods (or improving other methods). Also the choice to set the age is in the hands of the parent, so I don’t see the benefit besides enabling the kid to choose app in a more self served manner (which you probably don’t want to allow).

      Seatbelts are there because it’s obvious you’re not in control of other drivers, even if your car has all the safety controls. The downsides are minuscule in comparison to the privacy discussion, in my opinion.