ruffsl@programming.dev to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 7 days agoWhy Flatpak Won and Snap and AppImage Didn't. - Cameron Knauffyoutube.comexternal-linkmessage-square123fedilinkarrow-up1150arrow-down114
arrow-up1136arrow-down1external-linkWhy Flatpak Won and Snap and AppImage Didn't. - Cameron Knauffyoutube.comruffsl@programming.dev to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square123fedilink
minus-squaremacniel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down4·7 days agoBut what about ubuntu servers, where snaps actually make sense?
minus-squareEldritch@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·7 days agoIt’s literally the only place it makes sense. Everywhere else, flat packs, or app images are just better. 🤷♀️
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 days agoThat sounds even worse. snapd will just randomly “upgrade” and break shit. That’s a headache on a desktop, but a total disaster on a server.
But what about ubuntu servers, where snaps actually make sense?
It’s literally the only place it makes sense. Everywhere else, flat packs, or app images are just better. 🤷♀️
That sounds even worse. snapd will just randomly “upgrade” and break shit. That’s a headache on a desktop, but a total disaster on a server.