You can take “justifiable” to mean whatever you feel it means in this context. e.g. Morally, artistically, environmentally, etc.

  • cally [he/they]@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Absolutely not — it’s a computer program, a piece of software, pretending to be human. I’ve always been against that, especially now that it’s less obvious if it’s a real person talking 🙆, or just a computer program someone prompted 🤖

    I value honesty, and, sincerely, I hate that the web is filled to the brim with AI ‘slop’. As a human being who values creativity, I don’t want to see that. Fundamentally it is made to mimic human output — it’s not just annoying, it’s disingenuous.

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You missed:

      • Starting with “What a great way to think about things!” or similar overly-positive reinforcement
      • Ending with “Do you want me to help you with…” that it ends with
        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yeah, I was thinking it was because of all the tells in one comment in such a perfect context is just too on point…

          But a bit triggered because I recently spent a a bit of time trying to figure out if someone replied to me was on something because their reply was so weird, irrelevant, and such vaguely annoying before I realized it was his LLM authored out of office message trying to be ‘cute’.

        • thinkercharmercoderfarmer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Now that you mention it, I see that it’s pretty blatantly slop parody. You got me – with the emojis , the em dashes, and most especially the lists of comma phrases that don’t really add to the text, I was sure that this was LLM spam 😅

          Well played 🎯