It gets my goat that people think it’s a good option. There are plenty of articles explaining some of the many issues with it, but a few are:

  1. It’s run by anti-LGBTQ+ crypto bros.
  2. It has ads right out of the box.
  3. It collected donations towards people who never signed up for them - then held them to ransom in exchange for the kind of information you should never share on the Internet.
  4. They’re a for-profit advertising company. “Privacy-centric” my elbow.
  • Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    160
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s a for profit ad company making a “privacy first browser”.

    Thinking for literaly a second about that sentence should tell you all you need to know.

    • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      you can do privacy friendly ads, it’s not because the entire industry has evolved to an horrible point that the good way of doing it can’t exist