I can only imagine the legal stonewalling. Sue who? The company who hired the device? The manufacturer? Programmers? The leasing company? Everyone passing the legal buck around making it incredibly difficult and expensive for anyone to sue in an attempt to exhaust the victim or their family.
So when one of these things eventually kill someone, who is held responsible?
How could that possibly happen in this case?
If you had read the article, or even just looked at the picture, you’d see that this is a security camera that walks.
Until they finally taste human flesh.
So, no MG mount?
Surprisingly no, and they also don’t have mortars or death ray eyes.
But, you wouldn’t know that reading some of the comments here.
No sad puppy face, either?
how fast can it go and how much does it weigh?
I think that you’ll find you don’t enjoy when 20 kg of steel comes barrelling at your knees
https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=Boston+Dynamics+Spot+Specifications
What are you, a doctor or something?
The owner usually. They can then sue the producer.
I can only imagine the legal stonewalling. Sue who? The company who hired the device? The manufacturer? Programmers? The leasing company? Everyone passing the legal buck around making it incredibly difficult and expensive for anyone to sue in an attempt to exhaust the victim or their family.
Boston Dynamics doesn’t kill people. It’s its investors for a more fascist world that kill people.