Early reactions to Nvidia’s DLSS 5 were swift and skeptical, with some observers likening the technology to an Instagram-style filter applied over gameplay footage. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang refuted the allegations, but subsequent clarifications have helped outline how the system actually works – and where it can fall short.

    • Deestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The waste is the point.

      It needs to be more expensive, because that can be leveraged for higher valuations.

      • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        DLSS stands for “deep learning super scaling.” It was always gen-ai. Those extra details weren’t being revealed, they were being generated.

        • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          While true, the way DLSS 2/3/4 does it is to take a bunch of low res renders of the game over time while wiggling the camera very slightly, and stitch them all together to generate a new, higher res image that very closely matches what the original would have looked like. The GenAI part is essentially just a very advanced temporal blending function that’s really good at detecting and smoothing out edges.

          DLSS 5 then runs an AI Instagram filter on top of the frame for “enhanced visuals”, because obviously we want our games to look like cheap AI slop.

      • Gsus4@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        But it was working fine and probably cheaper, this makes it worse. Where the fuck is QA?

          • Gsus4@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            “Those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked have been sacked.”