not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 9 hours agopaniclemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1354arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up1349arrow-down1imagepaniclemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 9 hours agomessage-square19fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSeductiveTortoise@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·edit-26 hours agoAnyone > 65 should be considered senile until proven different. After all, it’s not kids that get scammed out of their retirement funds. That’s not my opinion, but it might lead to changes.
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·5 hours agoKids don’t have retirement funds. If they did, and they had free access to them, they would definitely get scammed out of them.
minus-squareSeductiveTortoise@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·4 hours agoThat’s pretty much what I wrote, just lacking the sarcasm.
minus-squareChakravanti@monero.townlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 hour agoPossession of money is literally the definition of scammed.
Anyone > 65 should be considered senile until proven different. After all, it’s not kids that get scammed out of their retirement funds.
That’s not my opinion, but it might lead to changes.
Kids don’t have retirement funds. If they did, and they had free access to them, they would definitely get scammed out of them.
That’s pretty much what I wrote, just lacking the sarcasm.
Possession of money is literally the definition of scammed.