• Goodeye8@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I was going to dispute his bullshit but then I found this gem:

    And it would generate in the style of that, all consistent with the artistry, you know, the style, the intent of the artist. And so all of that is done for the artist, so that they can create something that is more beautiful, but still in the style that they want.

    Dude is literally saying AI will do a better job at creating art than the artist. Talk about being tone-deaf. The future of artistry isn’t a fucking etch a sketch and prompt engineering you fucking donkey.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I prefer this quote

      It’s ground truth structure data guided

      Nobody knows what it means, but it’s provocative

    • mrmaplebar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The future of artistry isn’t a fucking etch a sketch and prompt engineering you fucking donkey.

      Definitely not the future of art, but it could be the future of the media business. These greedy suits don’t care about “artistry” and will do anything to save money on labor costs. Unless, of course, people continue to push back hard against the ensloppification of everything we love.

      We hate AI, but to be honest we don’t have it nearly enough…

      • Goodeye8@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I have no illusions about managers and executives, who have never worked for a living, salivating over the cost cutting opportunity. I was talking more from the perspective of the artist. I doubt any artist would consider this as actual art because it’s the most soulless way of creating art. It’s the rough equivalent of writing about what you’d want to draw instead of actually drawing it.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          There’s a few of them. Notably, the guy who didn’t care that AI art is built on the back of copyright violations getting pissy about his AI-generated art not being eligible for copyright.

          But more importantly here, I don’t think most artists in the gaming industry are in much of a position where they can stand by their artistic integrity. If every publisher pushes studios into using AI to be more “productive”, the choice becomes between slopping or starving—and most people don’t like starving.

          We as consumers are the only ones that can afford to push back against this shit. Our survival doesn’t rely on buying DLSS 5 games so we have the ability to boycott them to send a message.