• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    if there was not as much scare of nuclear power.

    I was pro nuclear until solar became cheaper than nuclear but I think if there was less scare about nuclear, there would have been more Chernobyls. That happened because of thinking it’s completely safe.

    • MrQuallzin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Chernobyl happened through the incompetence of leadership, not because they thought it was “completely safe”.

        • MrQuallzin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I’d sure hope that the latest generation of a technology would be considered safe. That’s generally how things work. And then when accidents occur, we learn and make things safer the next time.

          As to them considering it completely safe, I’d love to read about that if you have sources. Cause I doubt that they thought it couldn’t fail.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I was pro-nuclear until Georgia Power stuck me with the bill for Plant Vogtle 3 and 4.

      (Or rather, I was pro-nuclear until shortly after construction began on a 7-year plan that ultimately took 15 years, when it started to become clear that gross incompetence and corruption was going to make it an expensive debacle.)

      Nuclear power from Vogtle 3 and 4 costs 16¢ per kWh (according to the linked document), by the way, compared to less than 0.1¢ per kWh expected by OP’s comic.