It seems like it would be trivial for them to reduce quality control and have customers just “deal with” chips that aren’t as stable. How come they aren’t doing this?

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Happens all the time… Back in the day if you had a chip with a failed math co-processor, you just sold it as a cheaper version without it. That kind of thing.