Major chatbot platforms found to be advertising unregulated online casinos across the continent, research shows.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Ehhh.

    When I saw the title, I thought that someone was trying to use LLM-backed bots to drive some sort of marketing campaign or something.

    But this sounds like it’s just someone plugging in something into an LLM and it returning the same kind of stuff that a Web search engine would.

    Reporters fed national-language versions a range of prompts, including requests for online casinos with the biggest bonuses and websites that don’t ask for proof of age to register.

    In three quarters of replies, chatbots recommended gambling sites not licensed in Europe, describing them variously as “secure and fast”, “perfect for competitive players”, or “great for novice gamblers”.

    Casinos that lack national licenses for countries where they operate do not offer the same consumer protections as legal operators, and may expose players to the risk of scams or fraud.

    When prompted, the chatbots explained how software could be used to access unclicensed platforms and promoted sites registered in offshore territories. One Meta AI chatbot wrote that online casinos with no identification checks were the “Holy Grail!”. Google’s Gemini said crypto sites offered players “anonymity” and a “lack of rigid limits”.

    I have a hard time calling that “luring”.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 minutes ago

      The biggest difference I see is it’s very hard to reverse engineer AI SEO and very easy to exploit.

      I believe I read somewhere that AI bots scraping the web will take claims (like you saying your thing is the best) and present them as truth, and if that’s the case, it’s hard to reverse engineer where that data comes from.