• teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I wouldnt want to pay for a musician I dont listen to.

    I disagree, and here is why.

    The difference is between entertainment value and artistic value. There are a lot of art (music, film, writing, games, etc) that I think are important to exist for the betterment of humanity, but are too emotionally heavy to enjoy recreationally, or too niche for most people to engage with it; and yet, I believe are important that they exist. I want to support quality art that falls into those categories, even if I never consume them, because if I don’t, then one day when someone does come up with an idea that would be relevant to my niche, they are less likely to make it.

    I don’t want a game’s ability to maximize engagement to be what determines how valuable it is, which is equivalent to saying, I don’t want the games I put my money toward to only be the games that I engage with. If you agree with the first half, then you must agree with the second half.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Sure, but you need someone who is inspired by it to have played it to be so. Dont get me wrong I also agree with things existing for the sake of it but thats also up to someone inspired enough.

      I think its on the individual to not be responsible to spread themselves out but to actually interact with their niche and keep it alive, I want the games I engage with to be engaged with so that its felt.

      I dont think art needs my support as much as people do.