• henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s an accurate name. The company has explicitly told us that they are a slop-first cloud company.

      • Left as Center@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They are way more than a cloud company: Outlook, both of them, left the could stage yesterday.

    • MurrayL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’ll probably attract downvotes for this, but I find ‘Microslop’ as cringeworthy as old staples like Micro$haft or Crapple.

      Like, yeah, they’re shitty companies. But calling them childish names just comes across as petty and insecure, kind of like when Trump gives someone a dumb nickname.

      • expr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Nah, microslop is a great name, especially because they throw tantrums about the name. It’s very descriptive of what they have become.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The difference between MicroSlop and Micro$haft or Crapple is that Microsoft is actively slopifying their product. And this isn’t just some PC vs Mac slapfight where people are coming up with insulting names, Microsoft actively bragged about pooping out 30% of code with AI and we have MONTHS of news articles about them fucking up their updates even more than usual (and I’ve been supporting MS products for close to 2 decades).

        There’s a reason MicroSlop responded to that and not Micro$haft. Because every big company gives their customers the shaft, but not many are actively sabotaging their product to quite the same extent as they are, so the (accurate) name really hurts the company’s brand because it’s an accurate description of their current output.

        • MurrayL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I can see that argument, sure. The fact that they asked people not to use it suggests it is having some effect on their brand.

          • Zorque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Or that they’re just very insecure and shortsighted and think that any negative effects on their current numbers are because of something as banal and petty as name calling instead of anti-consumer practices that drive customers away.

      • Triumph@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’ve always hated that kind of thing. There’s a presumption in it that “you think so, too” and fuck you don’t tell me what I think.