Another Discord alternative that popped up a few months ago like the others out of no where. This one promises voice channels and is evidently entirely encrypted.

But out of the blue they “halted” service and now one again are open for registration?

Has anyone tried this yet ? Just a web app and it’s not open source.

While it sounds promising , and not everything HAS to open source. I just can’t help but feel off about something…

  • warmaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If it was GPL and they wanted to go closed source, they could do it since they are the authors.

    The MIT is a problem when others (not the authors) go closed source.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The GPL would only let them close source their own code, but to close source any code that was contributed by others, they would need to explicitly ask permission from each and every user that added to the codebase, which generally isn’t feasible.

      That prevents the original creators from being able to benefit from free and rapid community development and then close sourcing it all later. To effectively close source the app, they would need to re-implement every contribution themselves.

      They would only be able to do what you describe with the GPL if they also required every contributor to sign a CLA which explicitly gives up ownership of the contribution to the project owners.

      The MIT license allows anyone (including the original creators) to close source the app without needing permission from anyone.