• WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    you are missing the point.

    It’s fine that a border guard checks my passport and lets me to go my way. who cares. It’s reasonable, and I believe that it’s for our safety. but automated checks do more: they log the exact times you crossed the border, store it for decades. all the unnecessary data will most likely leak or be used for nefarious purposes at some point.

    its like forced digital passes on public transport. when the driver checks your passes, no private info about my traveling/commuting habits is collected. but when passes need to be scanned, it is: gov id, time, location, stop number, line number. the public transport company really has no business in knowing when do I go to work, when do I head home, or when do I start using a different stop regularly, as it reveals so many other things about you, like whether you do anything in the city after work and how frequent is that.

    I travel over the border much less, but my point stands.

    What are you actually preserving by avoiding having your face scanned?

    in addition to the above, by having fewer face scans uploaded to the system, I expect the surveillance cameras on the streets to do a worse job on facial recognition even when I’m just going about my day in my home country.

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      No im not missing the point you just arent understanding the process before digital and after.

      The border guard doesnt just check you passport and move you along. They document your arrival and store it. They usually photocopy your passport and take a finger print. You have to register and provide a ton of info when traveling to another country it was never a private matter.