Read the whole thread

However, we don’t have a “hardened security” approach, we aren’t developing a phone for pedo(censored) so they can evade justice.

  • Taasz/Woof@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The Pixel phones were the only devices with secure enough hardware to make GrapheneOS viable, that’s why they developed it for them.

    It wasn’t because of some deal with google or anything like that.

    • herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Hardware security guarantees are irrelevant for most people, including myself. A very small segment of the popularion needs them.

      What matters infinitely more is who has access to your data. And Google is one of the worst offenders.

      • Lemmert@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        I don’t really see the issue. So you don’t really care about robust and trustworthy hardware. That I get to some extent considering you’re more worried about your data itself. But if you’re flashing your device with GOS, there is no data being shared to Google unless you specifically want to use Google Play Services or the Play Store. Both of which don’t come pre-installed

        Edit: I added the if

        • herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Robust and trustworthy hardware does not matter if the apps you need for daily life (like banking or public transportation) are so integrated with Google’s ecosystem that they leak everything.

          Breaking Google’s hold over Android is the most important security topic of all time. Everything else is secondary. GrapheneOS is not real security.

          • Lemmert@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            But how does this tie back to your original statement about GOS security and tying itself with Google? The issues you’re raising aren’t even a GOS specific one. I also find it strange to not call it secure because services themselves are reliant on Google’s services. That is not an issue any OS can solve. I say this as someone who does not rely on any Google services on my phone. I also believe you might be conflating security with privacy.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Buying a phone from Google (HTC really) does not give Google access to your data.

        There are no Google services installed by Graphene, you have the option of running Google services if you choose, but even if you choose to do so they are kept in a sandbox and not given privileged information on the system.

        • herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          There are no Google services installed by Graphene, you have the option of running Google services if you choose, but even if you choose to do so they are kept in a sandbox and not given privileged information on the system.

          Using Google hardware results in financial gain for Google, which is one of the worst companies out there for privacy and security. I do not like that GrapheneOS is working to propagate Google’s monopoly.

          • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            You’re moving the goalposts, you said:

            What matters infinitely more is who has access to your data. And Google is one of the worst offenders.

            That’s completely different than who benefits financially from your phone purchase.