• rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If it’s a task that has to be done every day for 4 years, you’re actually saving time. And that’s if we assume only one person has to do it, if it’s 10 people, you’re saving time after 5-6 months. 10 minutes adds up quickly once it starts scaling.

    • railway692@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Assuming you set it up perfectly the first time, instead of it breaking for some reason six weeks later and then you spend three hours figuring out/remembering how you set it up in the first place and another two nights after work fixing it so it works as intended.

      Also your use case has changed, so it needs to be retooled to address the new situation.

      Other than that… worth it.

      • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        5 years is also a pretty arbitrary span to go with. You could smoothly discount future time savings instead, but then your discounting curve is arbitrary.

        The most rigorous way to go would be to set some kind of future goal, and then work your way backwards to find some kind of statistical description of the shortest path there, or else set some kind of future metric at a specific time and find the path that maximises it. This is pretty much how you design your investing portfolio, just with money instead of labour.

      • rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        spend three hours figuring out/remembering how you set it up in the first place

        I mean, you could also leave comments in your code, but that’s just me

        • railway692@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          My comments:

          // Do not change this timeout value. There’s a compatibility issue that causes requests to hang. Come back later to add details

          // Should probably refactor this bit

          // drunk, fix later

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Just one layer removed from the problem.

          “WTF does this comment even mean?”

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s more than that for me. I typically hate doing repetitive tasks but I love automating them and seeing my scripts or apps run or just checking a dashboard feels better.