Obviously, the internet has always been a toxic place, (the phrase “flame war” has been around for decades,) but it seems to have gotten so much worse over the last few years. I used to think decentralization of the internet would fix the worst of it, but Lemmy seems to have gotten worse alongside the rest of internet culture, proving me wrong. How do we fix/improve this culture of toxicity?

  • Libb@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    How do we fix/improve this culture of toxicity?

    We don’t because:

    1. it’s a wider issue than ‘the Internet’. Haven’t you noticed how even politics in general, which was supposed to be the epitome of our democratic societies, has morphed into an hate-filled shit show at best, when it’s not effing openly celebrating murders and assassinations of people we don’t like?
    2. we’re part of the issue. It’s not a ‘them’ vs ‘us’. It’s us. And most of us, no matter what we believe in, are acting like morons, at best.

    but Lemmy seems to have gotten worse alongside the rest of internet culture, proving me wrong.

    Lemmy has not “gotten worse” in my opinion. It was worse to begin with and when I arrived a few years ago, the first thing I had to urgently learn is how to filter out what I call its ‘noise’: that constant (and self-celebrating) hatred for ‘the other camp’, the hatred for those who dare not think like ‘us’ (I certainly don’t put myself in that group). I then moved from Lemmy to Piefed, mostly because back then at least it offered me simpler/more efficient ways to filter out that noise.

    How do we fix/improve this culture of toxicity?

    Like mentioned in other comments, the only way is through changing (civil) society itself. Aka through education.

    As long as our respective public educative systems (I’m from France, but I know it’s as shitty in the USA if not worse) are allowed to not do their job of actually educating and teaching kids some common values and principles (next to some actual knowledge and know-how), toxicity will thrive.

    It thrives because it has been normalized and because those who benefit from it are being regarded as role models. But it’s even worse than that: just publicly discussing this issue and its causes would expose anyone to being… punished by an angry toxic crowd of people that don’t want to hear they’re being toxic (or that their ‘ideology’ they want so hard to believe in have morphed them into assholes). That is a huge loss for any freedom respecting society, and a huge win for those benefiting from that hate/toxicity.

    edit: clarifications.

    • AskewLord@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Your posts are really great. Just wanted to say it’s super cool to have someone thoughtful contributing and articulating a realistic approach.

    • James R Kirk@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I don’t buy this narrative that toxicity is inevitable. That’s the narrative pushed by Reddit/Xitter/Meta because toxicity causes engagement which makes them rich. They don’t want to delete it. It’s only inevitable if admins allow it to be.

      That “rule” don’t apply on Fedi where we can simply join an instance that actively bans all the bs.

      • Libb@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        I don’t buy this narrative that toxicity is inevitable.

        You’re more than welcome to buy what you fancy, I don’t recall saying it was unavoidable. I even think I mentioned why we somehow manged to make it as… present as it is, and how we should try to get rid of most of it (hint: through education).

        Can we get rid of all of it? Nope, unless one is to pretend we’re perfect? Don’t know about you but I’m certainly not perfect.

        • James R Kirk@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          My belief is that toxicity online is like building a six lane highway through a residential neighborhood. If you build the infrastructure to support more cars, and the law allows speeding you’re going to get more cars (and more car accidents).

          If you build platforms that don’t allow cars/limit their behavior where people are trying to have a polite conversation, you’ll see quiet more thoughtful modes of transportation and fewer innocent bystanders get hurt.

          Wow that analogy worked pretty well.

          • Libb@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            My opinion is that toxicity can be found in every little gesture in our daily life, no need for an highway. It’s also not somethign ‘external’ to us that appears because of poor decisions. It can and often thrives even in the most ‘humble’ or humane ‘infrastructures’, to use you image. Suffice to look how two people, say two neighbors, can literally hate on one another for petty reasons.

            If you build platforms that don’t allow cars/limit their behavior where people are trying to have a polite conversation, you’ll see quiet more thoughtful modes of transportation and fewer innocent bystanders get hurt.

            People can have a fight on the street, or in a pub, in a shop, at work, or wherever, even at home, within a family circle, because “he looked at me!” or because “I don’t like the way he dress” kind of reasons. Do you really think tech is the issue?

            But once again, you’re more than welcome to believe what you want to believe. Just don’t try to put words in my mouth that I did not say.

            • James R Kirk@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              I’m not trying to put words in your mouth, but it sure seems like you’re saying that toxicity can inevitably be found in every little gesture in our daily life, including internet platforms, which is a narrative I disagree with.

              People can have a fight on the street, or in a pub, in a shop, at work, or wherever

              Pretty much all pubs and shops I know quickly expel and ban people who fight there. If those places allowed fighting (as many internet platforms do) users looking for a fight would eventually gravitate there, and people looking to discuss peacefully will go elsewhere.

              Do you really think tech is the issue?

              No, I’m saying people are the issue. Toxicity is not something that can be found everywhere, it only pops up where it’s allowed to flourish.

      • AskewLord@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Why?

        toxicity is inevitable in real life such as much. toxic people are everywhere, and they drag people down with them.

        i’ve had toxic family, friends, and co-workers. sometimes you have no choice but to live with it, sometimes you can ignore it, sometimes you can boot the person from your life if they cross certain boundaries. and sometimes the toxic person tries to get you removed.

        the false tech bro assumption I’ve seen since forever, is the idea you can engineer out people’s negative behaviors and impulses… you can’t. they will find a way to exploit whatever system you set up. that’s what they do… that’s what makes them toxic. you cannot create a social media network that is free from toxic people, unless you make one with no people involved.

        • James R Kirk@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I’m not talking about engineering a problem away. I’m saying it can’t be engineered away and requires human adults in the room (moderators in this case) to handle bad behavior.

          Accepting the presence of toxicity as a fact of life does nothing more than attract more toxicity.

      • AskewLord@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        and sometimes you have no choice but to submit. and that’s OK

        it’s also not your fault if a drunk driver or similar crashes into you and causes a traffic jam… it’s the other person’s fault.

        way too many toxic folks on lemmy are apologizing for the drunk driver and blaming the victim constantly. especially when they identify with the drunk driver or start thinking ‘he had no choice!’

    • baitu@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Couldn’t agree more! People should be more tolerant and stop hating on people having different opinions