Yes, they did, but there are measurements to go along with that.

  • Insekticus@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    They really did get more costly.

    As the industry moved to having C-suite executives and parasite-class CEO trash who have absolutely no creativity or useful leadership capabilities involved in the business, the drain on funds and resources sky-rocketed without an iota of improvement to the games… just laundering more money from the worker-developers into the hands of executive shitstains and investor scum.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Not so much covered in this article, but the vast majority of the spending is in paying more developers, and executive pay, which is largely in stock, isn’t a large contributing factor. Your favorite game from 25 years ago was probably made by 30 people in 18 months, and now the equivalent level of production value today is made by somewhere between 300 and 1500 people over a longer stretch of time.