TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 7 days agomine rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square61linkfedilinkarrow-up1726arrow-down17
arrow-up1719arrow-down1imagemine rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneTotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square61linkfedilink
minus-squareTotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up82·7 days agoFake: no way a 4 channer finds such a wholesome relationship Gay: op never specified their gender
minus-squaremycodesucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up45·7 days ago Gay: op never specified their gender
minus-squaremanxu@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·7 days agoI mean, the part about nutting into her does give a clue about gender, no?
minus-squaremycodesucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·6 days agoIf there’s one thing Lemmy has taught me repeatedly, it’s that what’s in one’s pants doesn’t necessarily correspond to one’s gender identity. CIS but working at being inclusive and understanding.
minus-squarethethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 days agoa clue, but that is not “specifying”
minus-squarethethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·6 days agowaow (basedbasedbased)
Fake: no way a 4 channer finds such a wholesome relationship
Gay: op never specified their gender
attentionerectionFTFY
I mean, the part about nutting into her does give a clue about gender, no?
deleted by creator
If there’s one thing Lemmy has taught me repeatedly, it’s that what’s in one’s pants doesn’t necessarily correspond to one’s gender identity.
CIS but working at being inclusive and understanding.
a clue, but that is not “specifying”
waow (basedbasedbased)